Google Analytics Alternative

Stop Apologizing for Using Wood

I try to keep my “work” blog and this blog separate and just focus on what is happening in my shop. I don’t have any kind of mandate forcing me to do so, it just is a personal choice because I have always kept my writing here free of sponsors and endorsements. Just my thoughts and the work I do in my wood shop. Lately I have read some things elsewhere online, had some conversations via social media, and even a few phone calls both as The Renaissance Woodworker and the Director of Marketing for a lumber company about using wood and environmental responsibility. I just had to say something in an effort to get some real information into the ether and hopefully stop some of the stupid falsehoods that my fellow woodworkers seem to have been fed. Somewhere along the line we woodworkers have been bullied into thinking we are doing something wrong by working with wood, especially anything exotic. This needs to stop. Stop apologizing for using wood: an infinitely renewable, highly sustainable, and environmentally friendly construction medium. Whether you are selling your work or just building for your own enjoyment, you need to educate yourself in order to defend your position when the inevitable environmentalist comes trying to make you feel bad for not caring about your environment.

So hang on, I’m going to blur the lines of my two jobs pretty drastically here and send you on a world wind link tour in the hopes that this post can be a reference for my woodworking band of brothers.

Wood is Already Green

Tropical LumberWood doesn’t need a special certification label to be green. As a marketer I truly admire the machine that has inserted FSC into household usage across the US. I won’t say that FSC isn’t a good thing, but the certification isn’t a magic bullet that means no puppies were harmed nor greenhouse gas expelled during the harvest and sawing of the stick in your hands. In most cases provenance on an FSC product is a short trail filled with doubt, yet somehow it has become the gold standard for environmental responsibility. We should be concerned about how our forests are managed and the responsible woodworker should look upstream in the supply chain and understand where their wood comes from and what has happened from stump to their wood shop. In many instances FSC can help with this. Relying on them to tell me my wood is green however is just silly. The irony is that wood is already green! It does actually grow on trees which has become the cliche for high availability. When you cut down a tree you can replant one in it’s place. In fact common practice is to replant 10-20 of them. It is the perfect renewable resource. A growing tree actually sequesters more carbon than an old growth tree so in terms of combating the Greenhouse Effect, nothing could be better. On the converse, nothing releases that sequestered Carbon faster than a forest fire which is common in an old growth, poorly managed forest. Don’t let anyone tell you that you have to buy this specific brand or species to be a green woodworker. “Green Woodworker” is already redundant. Be proud of it. Read more about the ultimate green building material.

Illegal Logging is Not Rampant Globally

Sustainable LumberHow many times have you heard this one:
“I only use locally sourced lumber in my projects to protect the rainforest”
The sentiment is nice and it makes everyone feel good but it is claptrap! I’m not going to sit here and deny that deforestation in the Amazon basin or in the Far East is happening. The facts are clear on that and it is clearly visible from the air. Guess what, the lumber industry isn’t causing it. Almost 95% of the rainforest land clear cut was done by the cattle ranchers and farmers. If any industry is concerned about the health of the forests it is the people who actually make their living selling forest products. Long gone are the days of cut and don’t look back from the end of the 19th and early 20th century. Replanting initiatives were started in the early 20th century here in North America when loggers sheepishly realized the damage they were causing. Sustainable forestry (link for more on this topic) was born then (probably earlier if you look hard enough) and at least here in North America it has continued and become even more of an exact science called Silviculture. The South American, African, and Asian forestry industry didn’t make this realization until much later and that is a sad reality. However, tropical species grow much faster than our temperate species so aggressive replanting initiatives have brought many species back from the brink of endangerment. In most cases forest regulation is much tougher in foreign countries than it is here in the US and Canada. Long term forestry management plans are required just to apply for a land concession. Trade regulations go one step further and though as an importer they can be a bit obnoxious and dramatically drive up the price of lumber, the long view is to prevent the wholesale destruction that existed in the past. Illegal logging does happen. I wish it weren’t true, but those logs are not making it into US and European markets because of the heavy regulation in the form of the Lacey Act and CITES. Black markets exist everywhere so something must be slipping through but unlikely that you are buying illegally logged boards when you go to your lumber dealer. Last I checked, there weren’t many guys selling boards out of the back of their truck on the street corner. The products from this illegal and unethical logging have grown in recent decades due to the overwhelming demand from newly developing countries in the far east like China who seem to have the same attitude that we had in the 19th century about forest conservation. This is where the concern should lie and not on woodworkers in the US, Canada, and Europe. Regulation has made it very difficult to get material that is not the product of responsible forestry plans.

We MUST buy Exotic Lumber to Protect the Rainforests

Teak Lumber MillLumber is a business. It requires a significant investment of capital and manpower to produce logs that can be sawn into lumber. Regulation requires that long term plans be in place to ensure a healthy forest that can continue to produce logs to meet demand while not damaging the health of the forest. Caring for the forest is essential to ensure the business will survive. Bans on logging or a lack of market demand means that the capital expense cannot be regained in profit from sale. ROI plummets and the business must find a way to make a profit on their inventory. This is absolute, business 101. So how does the land owner survive? They sell their land which is now useless for producing their product to someone who can use it for other purposes where their is a market. Forests are cut down to be used as farm land or cattle land instead. All because the demand for the initial product (trees) died. If we continue to buy exotic lumber, trusting that these businesses have a vested interest in maintaining a healthy forest then the market remains strong and protects those trees from clear cutting. Boycotting exotic lumber because you are concerned about the environment is the worst thing you can do. I can think of 5 actual examples where suppliers of ours in Africa have stopping harvesting Khaya (African Mahogany) because the price has been driven down so low that it is impossible for them to make a profit while maintaining the forests. In almost every instance, the concession has been sold to a non lumber company to recoup losses. This brings up another issue. Not only to we have to continue to buy this lumber, we have to recognize that costs need to continue to rise in parallel to the rising fuel and labor costs in emerging economy nations. In many instances, raw material prices has been driven down to the point where it isn’t worthwhile to stay in business. This is not just for exotics but also here at home with our domestic species.

I could go on for several more pages and if this line of thought interests you then please stop by my blog at J. Gibson McIlvain. I talk about this stuff and much more every week. I’m sorry to knock down the barriers I have tried to keep in place between my jobs but I have grown very tired of hearing good people apologize for something for which they feel ashamed. Lumber is one of the greenest products in the world. We make beautiful things out of it and protect our environment as well as make a tangible effort towards continuing to protect our earth at the same time.
Yes, I’m a woodworker. I use woods from all over the world BECAUSE I am concerned about the environment.

Your Turn

What environmental concerns do you have with using lumber? How do you convey to your customers and friends that woodworkers are environmentalists? Please share your thoughts and experience in the comments below.

Leave a Comment:

All fields with “*” are required

Darren Brewster

Great post Shannon, it is always nice to hear some sense in these discussions.

Richard Henry

Thanks for your clear statement.

Regards,
Richard

Tim Ogden

Shannon,

this is exactly what I was hoping for when I pinged you on Twitter about it.

The one thing I would note is that the vast majority of the “enviro-nazis” are well-meaning people who are the innocent recipients of bad information. We shouldn’t fault them for trying to do the right thing or encouraging others to do the right thing to protect the planet.

The reason I really like it when you write about these things, here or at J. Gibson McIlvain, is that I get useful and reliable information to help me make wise choices. I think we’re all going to get much further if we assume good intentions on all sides and try to guide those good intentions to worthwhile and useful actions.

Tim

    Shannon

    Tim, it would be nice to assume we all have best intentions but I’m starting to question that. Several of my colleagues and customers have appeared in front of congress for Lacey discussions and have been verbally abused and threatened by the green lobbyists. I will remain hopeful but it is tough when the accusations fly.

      Galoot

      Well, you can’t expect reason from a lobbyist.

      But treehuggers (not lobbyists) do deserve a bit of our patience. After years expending energy refuting the logical fallacies anti-environmentalists throw in our path, some Greenies can get real tired. It’s easy (not right, but easy) to fall into the trap of dismissing out of hand everyone with a contrary argument, even when the argument isn’t contrary at all!

      It’s sad, because you’re right. There are some black & white issues when it comes to environmentalism, but this isn’t one of them. It’s more complicated than “killing bad – growing good.”

      I’m a granola-eating, tree hugging, whale humping hippie. And while I want to protect our giant trees out of respect for their centuries of life, that doesn’t mean I want all logging to stop. Just keeping everything sustainable is good enough for me.

Rob Horton

Bravo.

Trevor Angell

Fascinating. Thanks for the post.

Brander Roullett

Interesting post, and I don’t mind it showing up here on this blog.

I’m one of those guys who tries to use only sustainable sourced materials when I can, and I think that there is an appropriate level of scrutiny that should be given to lumber. I’m not going to stop woodworking because of my beliefs in sustainability, like you I think we should be working with wood! However, I think it’s a fair question to ask where the wood comes from, and how it’s harvested.

I think that definitely should be part of the conversation when it comes to lumber. It has to start somewhere, and asking the question about whence it came is a good way of making sure the answer is good one.

I also think it’s a good idea to explore other less heavily harvested species to give some of the rarer woods a chance to rebound. As you say “Lumber is a business” so we should create demand for sustainable products, and make everyone happy.

Anyway, good post.

badger

    Shannon

    Excellent final point and there are companies out there trying to do just that. It is a tough row to hoe however because of the substantial investment to go to market with a new project and have the logistics behind it set up. We need to remember that we woodworkers who love to try new woods and adore defects are an extremely small minority. The industry cannot sustain itself on the activity of that minority. I think this is where the locally sourced option has a good avenue to exploit because the overhead can be driven down dramatically especially in reclaimed and storm damaged lumber.

    The far easier road would be to spread “tolerance” for lower grade material. This is the message Bob Taylor is going for in a very high end product. If more of the existing popular species can make it to market with a decent price so companies can make a profit on it then less waste results from the already existing industry. That would be a bigger win in my opinion.

jasongc

Thanks for the post, Shannon. I had hoped to bring up many of the issues you raised, but the post was closed to comments before I could return. It is refreshing to see a post concerning exotic wood use that offers facts and hard numbers that are ignored, either out of convenience or ignorance, by those that feel it their duty to heavily regulate and outright ban the use of a sustainable product.

Not to stray too far off topic, but the whole green industry (as that’s what it has now become) deserves a FAR more critical eye than that which it currently receives. Too often simple facts and common sense are pushed aside in favor of ”doing something” which does no more than impede commerce and lower quality of living for the singular benefit of raising the self-esteem of the activists.